oSC13, Strategy and Stable

At the openSUSE conference there were discussions about the future of openSUSE. Last Wednesday I summarized some of the ideas around Factory. Today I blog about the openSUSE releases.

Note: This is a combination of stuff I heard (not just at oSC but also earlier - even from the first strategy discussion, 3 years ago) and ideas I have. I just attempt to put it into text so it is easier to shoot at, comment upon, think about.

Stable - big picture

On the Stable release future, things are much more in the air. In his keynote, Ralf hinted that SUSE has some ideas about how the future of openSUSE should look:

• Open Governance - SUSE wants openSUSE to be successful and independently strong. Ralf noted that SUSE does not expect or aim to make money on openSUSE directly; other parties however are very much welcome to build a business around openSUSE.
• Filling the gap - SUSE and openSUSE have a great win-win relationship. But SUSE notices a gap between openSUSE and SLE in the market: SLE is oriented to large enterprises and the current openSUSE has a too wide market to feed, from newbies to hard core developers to professionals.

This is, from the SUSE side, the big picture; SUSE wants to provide room in the openSUSE ecosystem for initiatives, both from volunteers and from the commercial side. And SUSE would like openSUSE to move up a little, offer solutions for people serious about computing in a professional capacity. But what does this mean exactly?

Concrete changes

Let's start again with what came out with the keynote. Ralf essentially summarized some of SUSE and openSUSE's history and talked about our current situation. openSUSE Stable, our final release coming out every 8 months, is a compromise between stability and being-up-to-date. But this compromise was made in a time when far less people used the many repositories on OBS offering more up-to-date software; and before Tumbleweed and Evergreen saw the light of day. It is 2013 now and Ralf hinted at a possible re-evaluation of the choices that were made back then: perhaps, we should limit our scope, improve quality and increase the life cycle of openSUSE?

Improve quality

Let's talk about quality first. This is difficult, harder than it seems. Factory has some automated testing and openQA got better thanks to some recent work, but nothing can replace human testing and there is not enough of it. There is room for improving our processes here, but there is also the fact that some people in our community care more about Stable and others more about moving forward with Factory. We need to find a way to service the needs of both. Having Factory more stable, hence more usable on a day-to-day base, would be a great first step here.

Limit the scope

If you want to do something well, you should focus on it. It's the Unix philosophy many of us share: do one thing, and do it well. openSUSE is well known for doing everything a bit - making everybody a little happy, but nobody REALLY happy. Part of why this model is still working reasonably well is thanks to OBS - which has grown in this role. Many, many users these days use the openSUSE release as simply a base for their favorite OBS repositories. If we want to improve quality and lengthen the life cycle, we can use this model.

For example, parts of openSUSE which can be and are maintained longer get in the stable releases; other parts with a shorter life cycle (Firefox for example) stay on OBS. This means that being part of Stable depends on commitment from both upstream and the openSUSE maintainers of the packages; as well as testing capacity and our quality standards.

Lengthen life cycle

A portion of the openSUSE users would like to have a longer release cycle - the interest in Evergreen and questions on our mailing lists and forums make that clear. SUSE has dedicated a set amount of resources for maintaining openSUSE releases; checking security and entering bug fixes. The maintenance process is now opened up and some teams in openSUSE are contributing to the maintenance, lowering the load on the SUSE maintenance team. A smaller scope (resulting in a smaller release) would do the same, as Ralf mentioned in his keynote. This will have to be a part of the solution we're looking for to increase our maintenance window.

In practice

To put it in perspective, three examples of how we could do this. Keep in mind that sticking to the openSUSE-has-all-and-comes-every-8-months model is of course also an option...

Rings, rings, and rolling!

Presume we will have rings in Factory (see blog from Wednesday)? Let's put them in the distro. There's the core with ring 0 and ring 1 ("everything up to X"). It is released every 2 years and maintained for 3. Then, there is ring 2, with the basic desktops and their devel frameworks. They are maintained 2 years after release (every year). Then, ring 3, the applications and development tools. They are updated from OBS, essentially rolling.
It would of course be possible to keep ring 3 also stable - for, say, 1 year. Update it when a new release comes out - you can keep the core and desktop from the previous version but have the new apps.

Split it up in components

As Robert proposed on the factory ML this week it would be possible to split openSUSE Factory not per-se in rings, but in smaller components, dictated by their dependencies. Some would be one package, others would be multiple. Each component is developed by a team in a factory-like model. Rob states: "Each component advances based on it's own release cycle and the component team decides which release of it's dependent components to build against. Some tooling will be needed to help sort out the combinatorial problem."

And "when a release approaches,the release team picks a version of the core component that will be the base for the next openSUSE release. This version is used to populate factory and may be the only component that is in factory for a little while." This scheme should make the job of the release team easier but would still allow us to release the same openSUSE. Perhaps faster, perhaps slower - or perhaps in pieces, giving users an unprecedented level of flexibility!

Core, selection + OBS

How about we take the core of openSUSE (ring 0 and 1 from Coolo?), add a few components which have a long-term commitment from their teams; and let OBS take care of the rest! So, we'd have, say, the Core, our default desktop with a base set of applications for it, LibreOffice and Firefox. That is the release. The rest you grab off of OBS. The core is maintained for a longer time (this very much depends on community input!) and much more tested than what we ship today.

To limit the impact of the change and for the convenience of our users, the installer would still be able to offer the same choices as it always has; but besides adding the packages, it also enables the repository they are found in!

Initially, the release would be a lot smaller than it is today - but in time, as people step up for long(er) term maintenance, it will grow again. The idea is similar to what was proposed on the factory ML this week, but might lead to less clashes between components as there are less of them (much is in the core, presumably).

The real discussion

The issue with all the above scenarios is that while we can technically do them (some are harder than others, of course) the choice doesn't just depend on what we can do but also on what we should do. That makes the discussion a lot more interesting. We have to fix some things in our process, adjust to reality, that is clear. But do we want to shift direction, too? What is our real goal?

Our previous strategy discussion hinted at the fact that most of our users are professionals, people used to computers. We decided not to focus on newbies and making things simple to the expense of flexibility of our distribution. Should we go further on that path, make harder choices to focus on people using computers for a living?

Conclusion

What I tried to illustrate with the 3 examples is that we can go in various directions. It will be up to some of our core developers as well as the dev teams to comment on what makes most sense, what is the least amount of work for the biggest benefit (to users). But there's also the question of who those users are!

oSC13, Strategy and Factory

The openSUSE conference had some chats about strategy. Ralf talked about suggestions from SUSE in his keynote and there were more suggestions discussed in person between various people. I'd like to summarize some of the things I heard. In this blog I will talk about the directions of Factory, what Ralf mentioned as SUSE's ideas from his keynote; later this week I will blog about the openSUSE releases.

This is a combination of stuff I heard (not just at oSC but also earlier - even from the first strategy discussion, 3 years ago) and ideas I have. I just attempt to put it into text so it is easier to shoot at, comment upon, think about.

Factory

Let's start with talking about Factory.

Who is it for

We need to think about who factory is for, how these people are supposed to be using it etcetera. Right now, we have a shared understanding - but it probably isn't always as shared as it seems and it can be good to write things down and talk about them (see my keynote at oSC). Some of these thoughts will come to the mailing lists, I am sure, over the coming months.

Where should it go

On the technical side, there are some things I've heard about and seen several times and which will most likely see some form of implementation:

• more automated testing - the openSUSE team did a openQA sprint but many agree that there is more room for improvement.
• getting more people involved - As Ralf said, SUSE will commit to more SLE engineers on openSUSE; and the community & the openSUSE team should work more on both growing our dev pool and training people. In a GSOC discussion about this at oSC, this point was made as well: it would be good to use GSOC also for bringing existing contributors to a higher level.
• Bringing Tumbleweed, Devel projects and Factory in alignment - As Ralf noted in his keynote, not all work on Devel projects and Tumbleweed benefits Factory and openSUSE ultimately - it would be great to unite forces and bring them all in one process!
• segmenting Factory in rings - which Coolo has been talking about for a while now. It would create a Ring 0 with the bootstrap- and compiler infrastructure, ring 1 with the base system and other rings on top of that. He has been experimenting with this, hinting at some results in this mail. I leave it up to a later post (perhaps by/with Coolo) to be more concrete about this whole thing once the core Factory team has talked to more people and expanded upon it...

That last point is by far the least concrete - it is an idea which is discussed and toyed with. How much and what exactly will happen - only the Geeko knows ;-)

Some discussion has started on the mailing list, by the way, with the idea of segmenting Factory in even more 'components' than just the rings. I had a chat with Coolo before this proposal came out and I suggested the same thing. He noted that it would lead to a huge mess of dependency issues, including many circular ones (he gave libpoppler as example). This is already brought into the discussion there, let's see where this goes!

Akademy and openSUSE Conference

It's been a insane 7-8 days. Starting with Akademy, where I gave just one talk but still have notes on 5 or 6 sessions to send to the mailing lists, followed up with the openSUSE conference where I give 3 workshops, 3 talks and a keynote, luckily not all unique or alone. The latter is still happening, I just wanted to share some thoughts ;-)

Akademy...

... was awesome as always. I really like that the community is moving forward with thinking about the future. The manifesto is of course a first step but there were BoF sessions talking about the position of KDE e.V. and how it relates to other projects which might want to join us or that we work with; and I ran a session with Valorie and Peter on how to deal with the dark side of community - the least fun moments. (I'll mail to the community ML about this)

Now I am aware that some of these things don't move as quickly as many would like. The manifesto is great but also excluding projects and people many of us actually don't want to exclude. And I bet that beyond that there is even more room for KDE e.V. to play a role, say in helping other FOSS organizations handle GSOC money or even more. Or think about our relationship to Qt...

Meanwhile, I'm of course still concerned with the Marketing side of things. At my presentation I put forward some strategic thoughts from the KDE Marketing Workgroup in this area and there was some good feedback, also in the BoF session about this. If you're on the promo list you can expect mail some time next week.

And many thanks to Carl and everybody at Akademy in helping getting articles out on the dot! It was real team work and that does not only lead to better results but is also a whole lot more fun... Awesome!

openSUSE Conference

Like Akademy, I spend the first oSC day running around, talking to people. And having a few more hours of meeting-with-the-board than I care for. The keynote by Georg however was a great start of the day (see article on news) and I must say the Greeks have outdone, well, everybody. There is a lot of creativity and fun everywhere - from the beach ball shooting (at the audience...) in the welcoming talk to the small pools outside, the style of the event is just awesome. Lots of fun.

On the content side, I really enjoyed talk by Alexjan Carraturo. He pointed out many hard issues with promoting Linux in Italy. And he's an excellent speaker, too - his English might be a tad Italian but it is not hard to follow and his presentation and slides are awesome. Most importantly, he brings up a lot of real excellent, interesting issues which the local team bumps into. From political and economical to social. They have found very creative solutions like the 'openSUSE Live USB station' where people can put in a USB stick and get their live openSUSE on it or using bare ARM board to draw people into the booth.

Max Huang (sakana) gave a great talk on how things are going in Taiwan - amazingly much better. Where Alexjan brought up the many troubles he and his fellow Geekos (and tuxies and more) run into, Max seems almost exhausted by the many open source events taking place in Taiwan! He showed some impressive numbers and facts about what is going on in Asia - clearly, that's where we, as FOSS community, need to put more focus.

Before these two ambassadors sharing their experience, Richard and myself spoke about new directions in the ambassador program and merchandising handling. Of course there were many, many more talks but I haven't seen that many and the above did catch my attention mostly because this is the area I care strongly about...

Currently I'm listening to the openSUSE Board talk about technical directions for openSUSE in response to a question. SUSE has some ideas on that and is sharing those with the community at this event, which is an interesting experience.

oSC isn't over yet and there is much more to come, I look forward to much of that ;-)

(edit: fixed some stupidity with names, I wrote this too quickly)

oSC2013 next!

After Akademy 2013 in Bilbao, we will fly (via Berlin...) to Thessaloniki, Greece, where the openSUSE Conference will take place. Like I argued for Akademy, oSC is a relevant and useful event for the openSUSE folk.

History - oSC 10, 11 and 12

This year oSC takes place in Greece, a fact far more relevant than it might seem. The first three openSUSE Conferences I attended took place in Nürnberg. First in a conference center, the third was the legendary oSC2011 in the Zentrifuge, an old factory building creating an absolutely amazing atmosphere. Both events were largely organized by SUSE employees from the Nürnberg office but oSC11 already had a fair involvement of volunteers and a strong focus on BoF sessions and 'getting stuff done'. We had a lively marketing and ambassador team by then. I vividly remember the day before the event, when I rode a van full of crazy geekos by a few stores, buying everything from carpets and plants to lights to dress up the location. Every day we figured out who would staff the bar, organize stuff in the rooms - and moving the chairs was a matter of asking outside if a few folk would be willing to help out. At this event, there was already talk about doing the openSUSE conference in Greece.

First Prague

But going from doing the event in Nue and by SUSE people (with help) to doing it in Greece by volunteers (with help) seemed a big step and the team also had limitations as to the date and time: the event would have to be in May or June. As it was already September when oSC'11 took place, that was very close.

There came a different proposal from Michal and others in Prague, and with an office there, we decided it made much more sense to do it there and told Kostas that he'd have his oSC in Thessaloniki, but one year later. I joined Michal in scouting for a location in Prague and discovered a local community was about to organize another Linux event a mere two weeks after the openSUSE Conference! I proposed to merge the two, and the format of oSC'12 was born. Like oSC'10 two years earlier, this event tried to focus on collaboration and bringing communities together. I unfortunately had to scale back my involvement in the conference significantly after LinuxTag Berlin in May 2012 due to health issues and barely could make it to the event itself. Meanwhile, the Greeks had already started preparing the organization of oSC'13 and were present with a large team at oSC'12 to help run the show.

Greece in 2013

Feedback from the event did show that the openSUSE community wanted more 'Geeko time', so the Greek team has made sure that there will be a good openSUSE focus at the event. Of course, without compromising our open nature: there will be plenty colors besides green. Naturally, SUSE input will be lower than usual - the Nürnberg can't easily take a afternoon off to visit, even a bus trip is not enough. But we have made sure that many central developers will be there and there is a host of great sessions coming - a post about that on news.opensuse.org is coming soon!

Due to the internal changes at SUSE, I haven't been as much involved in the event as I would have liked but just seeing the conference team work has been amazing. It isn't just a Greek affair, mind you - for example, the logo and much artwork comes from the other side of the world, by the hands of US citizen Anditosan and Brazilian Carlos Ribeiro! And as with the Prague conference, Izabel Valverde again played a major role in handling travel support and sponsors. And we have Robert Schweikert and Henne Vogelsang, working on the program and website, Matt Barringer building OSEM (!!!) and some others.

Awesome

I might be overusing that word - but I really, really think oSC'13 will be awesome. As far as it is up to the Greekos organizing it, there's no doubt! And like with Akademy, if you haven't booked yet - you should...

Have a lot of fun and see you in Greece ;-)





PS: note that the above is mostly my memory of How Stuff Happened™. There were plenty more people involved, pushing, making it happen. Thanks to all of them, as we're gonna have a great conference in Greece ;-)